Build products for secure operation, not just launch.
Eresus combines backend, API, SaaS, and mobile delivery with threat modeling, secure architecture, code review, DevSecOps controls, and offensive validation.
Vulnerabilities our researchers found and disclosed
Public advisories credited to the Eresus research team. The same people run your engagement.
This engagement creates value fastest for teams like these.
Teams shipping under delivery pressure
Engineering organizations that need backend, mobile, DevOps, or DevSecOps support without losing security rigor.
CTOs and platform leads
Leads that need architecture, release, and operations support tied back to offensive validation priorities.
Programs that want build plus hardening
Buyers that do not want a separate delivery vendor and a separate security vendor working against each other.
Scope
Risk signals
Outcomes
Evidence standard
Proof you can inspect. Boundaries you can plan around.
Every engagement is bounded by written authorization, evidence handling, and a clear handoff. These are the defaults; the signed scope can tighten them.
Evidence you receive
- Architecture, code, or configuration decisions tied to the agreed scope.
- Reviewable changes, operational notes, and handoff documentation.
- Security tradeoffs, release risks, and hardening priorities made explicit.
- Verification steps for the delivered work.
Explicit exclusions
- A penetration test report unless testing is separately scoped.
- Production changes without an approved change window and rollback path.
- Compliance certification or ongoing 24/7 support unless contracted.
- Ownership transfer of third-party or pre-existing intellectual property.
Not scanner output. Offensive work that produces proof.
Scope and objective
We align assets, workflows, user roles, testing windows, and safe operating boundaries before execution starts.
Expert validation
Eresus analysts validate exploitability and business impact instead of forwarding automated scanner output.
Proof, fix, retest
Each finding ships with evidence, impact, remediation guidance, and retest steps so teams can close risk quickly.
The questions buyers want answered early.
How does this relate to pentest work?+
Do you work inside an existing engineering roadmap?+
What do teams get besides code or configuration?+
We tie risk to business impact.
Findings do not stop at severity labels. We explain which customer workflow, data class, or operational objective is affected.
Deliverables work for engineers and executives.
Engineering teams get reproducible proof and remediation direction; leadership gets the risk narrative, priority, and closure status.
Research and advisories that support this service motion.
The Silent Assassin of Modern APIs: BOLA / IDOR Vulnerabilities and Their Impact
Why does the undisputed leader of the OWASP API Top 10, Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA/IDOR), constantly evade WAF and DAST scanners? Defending...
What is DevSecOps? Automating Security with the 'Shift-Left' Approach
Understand the core principles of DevSecOps and Shift-Left security. Learn how to automate security checks directly into your software development...
n8n-mcp Authenticated SSRF: CVE-2026-39974 (GHSA-4ggg-h7ph-26qr)
CVE-2026-39974 is an authenticated SSRF in n8n-mcp multi-tenant HTTP deployments. Review affected versions, the 2.47.4 fix, and layered mitigations.
Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Arbitrary Command Injection in MCPHub Server Registration
MCPHub accepts attacker-controlled command and args values during server registration and spawns them through STDIO, enabling full remote code execution on the host.
Let’s scope this work against the surface that matters most.
Whether this starts as a pilot, a single application, a critical API, an AI agent flow, or a wider program, we start from the highest-impact surface.