EresusSecurity
ProductProducts

MCP Proxy

Security architecture and validation patterns for brokered MCP access, server registration, tool isolation, and integration visibility.

Risk & Regulation Signals

Command injection through untrusted MCP configuration.

Weak identity binding between transport endpoints and real users.

Silent supply chain inheritance from reference implementations and SDK defaults.

Built For

Teams exposing MCP servers to internal assistants or external customers.

Platform owners standardizing server registration and policy boundaries.

Security teams responding to fast-moving MCP ecosystem vulnerabilities.

Use Cases

Introduce brokered, inspectable access between agents and MCP servers.

Reduce direct STDIO and arbitrary command exposure in server registration flows.

Capture policy, audit, and isolation decisions in one control plane.

Related Content

Related Advisories

Frequently Asked Questions

Why focus on proxy architecture?

Because MCP security often fails at the boundary between agents, transport, configuration, and tool execution. A proxy helps make that boundary explicit.

Can this help with third-party MCP servers?

Yes. It is especially useful when you need inspection, policy, and containment around untrusted or fast-changing servers.

Need help validating this attack surface?

Talk with Eresus Security about scoped testing, threat modeling, and remediation priorities for this workflow.

Talk to Eresus