Evaluations
Security-oriented evaluation programs for factuality, refusal quality, tool execution, prompt resistance, and regression tracking.
Shipping behavior changes without clear evidence of what improved or regressed.
Evaluation suites that measure style but miss attacker behavior.
Governance programs that cannot demonstrate security readiness over time.
Built For
AI product teams moving from demos to measurable release criteria.
Security and ML engineers who need repeatable adversarial tests.
Governance programs that need evidence for model changes and rollouts.
Use Cases
Create benchmark sets for hallucinations, refusals, tool misuse, and unsafe retrieval.
Track regressions after prompt, model, or infrastructure updates.
Operationalize AI release gates around tested security behaviors.
Related Content
What is AI Security? A Complete Enterprise Blueprint for Securing Machine Learning Ecosystems
A deep dive into the complex world of AI Security. Understand the mechanics behind data poisoning, adversarial ML evasion, and prompt injection attacks...
Legacy SAST vs. AI-Powered Code Analysis: The Future of AppSec
Why are traditional Static Analysis (SAST) tools slowing down development teams? Learn how AI-powered autonomous agents are redefining application...
Llama 4 Series Vulnerability Assessment: Scout vs. Maverick
Meta has launched the Llama 4 family, featuring models built on a mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture. Here is our vulnerability assessment.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are these product evaluations or security evaluations?
They are security-forward evaluation programs that can also support product quality, especially for refusal behavior, factuality, and tool safety.
Can these be used in CI?
Yes. We can define benchmark sets and pass/fail thresholds that fit CI, staging, or controlled release workflows.
Need help validating this attack surface?
Talk with Eresus Security about scoped testing, threat modeling, and remediation priorities for this workflow.
Talk to Eresus