Dependency Security Review
— SBOM and License Risk
Offensive security testing customized for SBOM and License Risk risk profiles. Uncover critical vulnerabilities with our dedicated Dependency Security Review experts.
Free Scoping CallSBOM and License Risk delivery and security model
Application security work that turns a software bill of materials into usable security, license, and supply-chain evidence.
Focus areas
- SBOM coverage and accuracy
- License mismatch and commercial risk
- Transitive dependency visibility
- Audit and customer trust evidence
Delivery notes
- Inventory, risk, and ownership are reported together
- Release-blocking package policy is defined
- Readable audit evidence is prepared
Decision matrix
SBOM and License Risk is not just a service label; it states how each control is validated and which evidence is expected at closure.
| Control | Decision question | Validation | Expected evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| SBOM coverage and accuracy | Does SBOM coverage and accuracy create real risk? | Validated against the relevant code, request, configuration, or runtime behavior in Dependency Security Review. | Inventory, risk, and ownership are reported together |
| License mismatch and commercial risk | Does License mismatch and commercial risk create real risk? | Validated against the relevant code, request, configuration, or runtime behavior in Dependency Security Review. | Release-blocking package policy is defined |
| Transitive dependency visibility | Does Transitive dependency visibility create real risk? | Validated against the relevant code, request, configuration, or runtime behavior in Dependency Security Review. | Readable audit evidence is prepared |
| Audit and customer trust evidence | Does Audit and customer trust evidence create real risk? | Validated against the relevant code, request, configuration, or runtime behavior in Dependency Security Review. | Inventory, risk, and ownership are reported together |
What if SBOM coverage and accuracy fails?
Eresus maps this area to real user-flow or delivery-pipeline impact, so the finding is not left as a generic technical label.
What if License mismatch and commercial risk fails?
Eresus maps this area to real user-flow or delivery-pipeline impact, so the finding is not left as a generic technical label.
What if Transitive dependency visibility fails?
Eresus maps this area to real user-flow or delivery-pipeline impact, so the finding is not left as a generic technical label.
Proof-Driven Methodology
Asset Recon
Attack surface mapping & asset enumeration
Risk Modeling
Penetration testing beyond automated scanners
Exploit Chaining
PoC validation for every finding
Quality & Reporting
Remediation code + free retest
Frequently Asked Questions
What decision does SBOM and License Risk clarify?
SBOM and License Risk clarifies exploitability, affected workflows, and release impact for Dependency Security Review with evidence rather than scanner noise.
What evidence is included in SBOM and License Risk?
Inventory, risk, and ownership are reported together Also, Release-blocking package policy is defined. Retest criteria and ownership notes are included for closure.
How is this different from an automated scanner report?
Automated findings are not forwarded as-is; false positives are removed, abuse paths are proven, and remediation priority is explained.
Why Eresus Security?
Proof-Driven Reporting
Every finding is validated with a real exploit. No scanner noise — only proven risks.
Offensive Security Expertise
Specialized team in AI security, API pentesting, Red Team operations, and cloud security review.
Retest Support
Fixes are revalidated within the agreed engagement scope. Remediation guidance and developer-friendly notes are included.
Evidence-Ready Deliverables
Report format designed to support internal review, remediation tracking, and evidence-oriented workflows.
Related Service Areas
Validate Your Security Posture
Don't rely on scanner outputs. We execute the same techniques real attackers use — in a controlled environment, for you.
Get a Quote